The case outlines a new theoretical–methodological approach for the mapping and analysis of the social innovation ecosystems (SIE) in the city of Florianópolis, Brazil. The study was put into practice through the creation and implementation of a collaborative digital platform.
Name of Method
Brief description
The case outlines a new theoretical–methodological approach for the mapping and analysis of the social innovation ecosystems (SIE) in the city of Florianópolis, Brazil. The study was put into practice through the creation and implementation of a collaborative digital platform.
Type/Level of Method
Challenges
The approach is geographically mapping and categorizing social innovation initiatives in the city, how current initiatives operate, what categories are the most popular and how can these initiatives sustain themselves
Problem, Purpose and Needs
The approach developed an online platform to map the existing actors and social innovation initiatives in Florianapolis.
Relevance to Climate Neutrality
Challenges
Thematic Areas
Impact Goals
Issue Complexity
Issue Polarisation
Enabling Condition
Essential Considerations for Commissioning Authorities
Engagement Journey
Governance Models and Approaches
Enabling Conditions
Democratic Purpose
Spectrum of participation
Communication Channels
Actors and Stakeholder Relationships
Participant Numbers
Actors and Stakeholders
Participant Recruitment
Interaction between participants
Format
Social Innovation Development Stage
Scope
Time commitment
Requires dedicated time to do field visits and interview the funders and other relevant actors.
Resources and Investments
Typical duration
Resources and Investments
In-house
Step by Step
The very first step would be to create a repository online where data can be captured, and where initiatives and actors can provide their information in order to be mapped. Second, in order to understand the current legislation, regulations, and any legal aspects of social innovation in the city, insight should be gained into the public problems and social demands of the city as well as initiatives’ work on micro, meso and macro levels. This was achieved by:
Next, the main actors were invited to join the digital platform. Inviting actors helped identify additional social innovation initiatives supported by them in the ecosystem, increasing the sample of observed initiatives. The involvement of the main actors in the ecosystem as partners of the digital Observatory was also important to validate the data, legitimise the project, and co-create the platform. Once the Observatory was up and running, the questionnaires could be completed online. Further steps included:
|
Evaluation
Connecting Methods
Mapping methods developed in task 9.2
Flexibility and Adaptability
The steps mentioned in the approach are flexible enough that they can be taken and applied into a climate neutrality transition context as they are, provided there is an online dashboard or platform to present and store the data. For example, a city could map local energy initiatives by interviewing the main actors who support these initiatives, collect information about these initiatives’ activities and solutions. However, it has to be considered that cities vary across the South and North, with regards to local culture, institutional priorities and interest from funders. Therefore, the data collection procedure might have to be adapted to suit (existing) local practices, taking into account local customs and possible sensitivities.